4.1 Article

Racoleus japonicus sp. nov. (Teratosphaeriaceae, Ascomycota), a new sterile filamentous lichen collected from Japan

Journal

TAIWANIA
Volume 68, Issue 4, Pages 417-424

Publisher

NATL TAIWAN UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.6165/tai.2023.68.417

Keywords

Capnodiales; Cystocoleus; lichenized fungi; mtSSU; nuLSU; nuSSU; Racodium; Trentepohlia .

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new species called Racoleus japonicus is described. It has a blackish brown minutely filamentous thallus with lateral spines, vertical arrangement of hyphae with uneven and undulate to corrugated hyphal walls, and a Trentepohlia photobiont. It is distinguished from the known species R. trichophorus by having broader filaments, larger hyphal cells, and lateral sinuous spines. It was found on shady rocks in northern to southern Japan at elevations ranging from 290 to 1700 m. Molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal that R. japonicus is closely related to unidentified fungi of Capnodiales and is classified within Teratosphaeriaceae.
Racoleus japonicus is described as a new species. It is characterized by a blackish brown minutely filamentous thallus with lateral spines, vertical arrangement of hyphae with uneven and undulate to corrugated hyphal walls, and a Trentepohlia photobiont. In this genus, only R. trichophorus was known before the present study. Racoleus japonicus is distinguished from that species by having broader filaments (10-15 mu m wide), larger hyphal cells (10-20 x 3-7 mu m), and lateral sinuous spines. It was collected on shady rocks from northern to southern Japan at elevations between 290 and 1700 m. A molecular phylogeny based on nuSSU, nuLSU and mtSSU inferred that R. japonicus has a close relationship with unidentified fungi of Capnodiales, and that is not related to Cystocoleus and Racodium which have similar filamentous thalli. Based on the molecular phylogenetic analyses, R. japonicus is classified within Teratosphaeriaceae.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available