4.7 Article

From unlikely pairings to functional nanocomposites: FeTi-Cu as a model system

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY ADVANCES
Volume 20, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtadv.2023.100433

Keywords

High-pressure torsion; Nanocomposites; Fragmentation; Process monitoring

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A bulk nanocomposite with a FeTi-Cu composition was prepared using high-pressure torsion, and satisfactory microstructural homogeneity was achieved at high temperatures due to self-reinforcement. However, processing at room temperature remained challenging.
In order to develop materials for energy storage, a bulk nanocomposite with a composition of FeTi-25 vol% Cu was prepared by high-pressure torsion, with FeTi as functional phase for hydrogen storage and Cu as ductile phase to improve the processability. Despite the use of such a highly ductile auxiliary phase, the processability remained challenging due to strain localization in the softer Cu. This behavior is most pronounced at room temperature, and no nanocomposites were formed. At elevated temperatures, the strong strain rate sensitivity of the flow stress of the nanocrystalline Cu facilitates the formation of a FeTi-Cu nanocomposite due to a self-reinforcing process. Nevertheless, fragmentation of FeTi is limited because the resulting massive strain hardening prevents controlled processing at temperatures <250 degrees C, and Cu-rich shear bands develop at temperatures >250 degrees C. Satisfactory microstructural homogeneity is only achieved at the highest deformation temperatures of 550 degrees C. Overall, this study highlights that for unlikely material pairings, as often required in the pursuit of superior functional materials, the mechanical behavior of the phases involved and their interplay remains critical and must be thoroughly investigated when aiming for controlled structural homogeneity of bulk nanomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available