Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia at a tertiary hospital, South Africa

AimsThe aim of the study is to assess non-invasive diagnostic modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) when compared to histology.MethodsA prospective case-control study was conducted of patients presenting with conjunctival masses at a tertiary eye hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients completed an interview and had three non-invasive diagnostic tests: optical coherence tomography, impression cytology and methylene blue stain. A biopsy with histology was performed as the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis.ResultsOne hundred and eighty-two conjunctival masses of 175 patients were evaluated. There were 135 lesions identified as OSSN on biopsy and 47 lesions were benign on histology. Optical coherence tomography had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% (95% CI: 80.0-92.5) and 75.6% (95% CI: 60.5-87.1), respectively, when an epithelial thickness cutoff of 140 um was used. Shadowing was found in 46% of cases due to leukoplakia or increased thickness of the mass. Cytology had a sensitivity of 72.4% (95% CI: 62.5-81.0) and a specificity of 74.3% (95% CI: 56.7-87.5). Twenty-seven per cent of cytology specimens were excluded from analysis due to inadequate cellularity. Methylene blue had a high sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI: 85.9-95.9), but low specificity of 55.3% (95% CI: 40.1-69.8).ConclusionOptical coherence tomography had a high sensitivity and specificity as a non-invasive test and liquid-based cytology performed well but had a lower sensitivity and specificity than with optical coherence tomography. Methylene blue performed well as a screening test, with a high sensitivity but low specificity.

Automated summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate non-invasive diagnostic modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) compared to histology. Optical coherence tomography had a high sensitivity and specificity, while liquid-based cytology performed well but had lower sensitivity and specificity. Methylene blue had high sensitivity but low specificity as a screening test for OSSN.