4.6 Article

A fine discrete floor field cellular automaton model with natural step length for pedestrian dynamics

Journal

SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102841

Keywords

Crowd evacuation; Floor field model; Fine-grid model; Natural step length

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an extended FFCA model that integrates the natural step length into pedestrian movement, allowing pedestrians to occupy multiple grids and expanding the interaction area. Through simulation of evacuation scenarios, the model accurately reproduces density-velocity relations and matches experimental results. Compared to traditional models, this model generates more reasonable velocity variations and evacuation paths.
This paper proposes an extended floor field cellular automaton (FFCA) model for evacuation simulations, which integrates the natural step length into pedestrian movement. The model enables pedestrians to occupy multiple grids and extends the interaction area to a disk with a radius determined by the natural step length. These modifications facilitate pedestrian movement in various directions, limited only by the chosen numerical resolution. The model is calibrated to reproduce known density-velocity relations by simulating different evacuation scenarios. The flow rate through the bottleneck scenario matches the experimental results very well. Interestingly, the evacuation time, crowd shape near the exit and average conflict frequency are found to be independent of the discretisation degree, which is different from previous work. Compared with the traditional FFCA model, the proposed model yields larger and more reasonable velocity variation and evacuation path. The main parameters have a similar influence on the evacuation time, indicating that the proposed model retains the robustness of the traditional FFCA model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available