4.4 Article

Direct puncture versus contralateral femoral artery approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal arterial bypass grafts

Journal

CLINICAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 78, Issue 12, Pages E1001-E1009

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.08.028

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous direct puncture approach and contralateral femoral native vessel approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts. The results showed that the direct puncture approach is a safe and efficient method with comparable clinical outcomes to the native vessel approach. The rate of adverse events was slightly lower in the direct approach group, but without significance.
AIM: To compare the safety, effectiveness, and clinical outcome of percutaneous direct puncture approach versus contralateral femoral native vessel approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed comprising a cohort of patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures of occluded infra-inguinal bypass grafts between January 2013 and January 2022, with a follow-up period until June 2022. This included 55 procedures via the native vessel approach and 18 procedures via the direct puncture approach. Primary outcomes were technical success and procedural safety; secondary outcomes included re-intervention rate, limb salvage, and mortality as assessed by log-rank testing and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups with regard to patient de-mographics, except for the number of previous vascular procedures (n=6.83 +/- 3.07 direct approach versus n=4.96 +/- 2.79 native vessel approach, p=0.025). Thrombolysis was compa-rably successful in both groups (n=13/18; 72% direct approach versus n=42/55; 76%, p=0.723). There were no differences in the duration of thrombolysis administration. The rate of adverse events was slightly lower in the direct approach group, but without significance (p=0.092). There were no adverse events related to the puncture site in the direct approach group. No differences were found between the time-to-event values for re-occlusion, re-intervention, amputation, or mortality respectively (p=0.662; p=0.520; p=0.816; p=0.462). CONCLUSION: The direct puncture approach seems to be a safe and efficient approach for catheter-directed thrombolysis procedures in infra-inguinal occluded bypass grafts, with clinical outcomes comparable to the native vessel approach. (c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available