4.3 Article

Engineering the perfect mattress: The influence of substrate mechanics on deep tissue stresses in supine

Journal

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
Volume 110, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106130

Keywords

Finite element; Pelvis; Supine position; Tissue mechanics; Ogden; Soft tissues

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the influence of mattress stiffness on tissue compressive stresses during supine lying. Soft mattresses help relieve pressure, while firm mattresses increase pressure. These findings can guide the design of more comfortable sleep products.
Background: With increasing global interest in sleep hygiene, sleep ergonomics is an area that has been largely understudied. During sleep individuals turn over during the night to restore blood flow in occluded blood vessels, indicating that control of local tissue pressure may play a role in improving sleep comfort. This study investigates the influence of mattress stiffness on tissue compressive stresses during supine lying. Methods: A subject-specific 3D finite element (FE) model of the pelvis area has been developed to simulate supine lying on substrates of varying firmness. Constitutive parameters for the adipose-skin tissue and muscle-organ tissue were calibrated using a novel application of the inverse finite element method. Findings: The compressive stress was consistently greatest in the muscle interfacing the sacrum at 18.5 kPa on the soft foam, and 30.9 kPa on the firm foam. From soft to firm, the compressive stress increased by 67% at the sacrum, 20% at the ischium, 42% at the lesser trochanter, and 50% at the skin. Interpretation: The non-linearity of the foam substrate had a pressure distributing effect, relieving the peak compressive stresses at the sacrum, indicating that it may be possible to design arrays of foam substrates that can provide most efficient pressure relief.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available