4.7 Article

Microwave radiation induces modifications in the protein fractions of tef flours and modulates their derived techno-functional properties

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.126908

Keywords

Tef proteins; Physical modification; Protein fractionation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of microwave treatments on the structure, solubility, and techno-functional properties of proteins in tef flour was investigated. Shorter treatments at low moisture content improved emulsifying stability, while longer treatments at higher moisture content increased hydration properties.
The impact of microwave (MW) treatments on the structure, solubility, and techno-functional properties of the proteins in starchy matrices is still poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate the effects of MW intensity by applying 1, 2, and 6 min of radiation on two tef flour varieties moistened at 15 % and 25 %. The fractionation method recovered similar to 83 % of the total protein content in untreated flours. The interaction between treatment time and moisture content (MC) significantly influenced the extraction of protein fractions. Samples treated at 25 %MC showed significant reductions in albumins (up to -74 %), globulins (up to -79 %), and prolamins (up to -32 %). The SDS-extractable proteins of both tef flours presented similar molecular weights (12-100 kDa). SDS-PAGE analysis revealed decreased band intensity in MW-treated samples compared to untreated flours, and confocal analysis showed changes in the native state of proteins in treated samples. Shorter treatments at low MC significantly improved the emulsifying stability of tef flours, particularly in brown tef flour, with an enhancement of up to 203 %. The hydration properties significantly increased in flours treated at 25 %MC for 6 min. Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated the influence of treatment time and MC on protein recovery and functional properties of tef flours.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available