4.7 Article

Suppression of Monilinia Brown Rot by Bacillus spp. Strains

Journal

AGRONOMY-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13112839

Keywords

biocontrol; Monilinia spp.; lipopeptide biosynthesis; mode of action

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the antagonistic potential of 33 strains of Bacillus spp. against Monilinia spp. The strains B-241, B-313, and B-358 showed promising results in controlling brown rot. B-241 strain exhibited comparable efficacy to a synthetic fungicide and its ethyl acetate extract demonstrated bioactivity in vitro and ex situ.
Brown rot caused by Monilinia spp. is one of the main causes of pre- and postharvest losses in stone and pome fruit production. The use of beneficial microorganisms is considered one of the most promising, safe and effective alternative methods for controlling these pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the antagonistic potential of 33 Bacillus spp. strains, in order to identify the best candidate for brown rot biocontrol. Strains identified as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens B-241 and Bacillus subtilis B-313 and B-358 were chosen for further ex situ studies on detached apple fruit. The efficacy of B-241 (87.1-93.7%) did not differ significantly from a commercially available synthetic fungicide (p > 0.05). The putative mode of action of B. amyloliquefaciens B-241 against Monilinia species is competition for nutrients and antibiosis. The ethyl acetate extract of the strain, applied at 5 and 12.5 mg/mL, was bioactive in vitro and ex situ. A HPLC analysis confirmed the presence of surfactin and bacillomycin D in the extract. However, before developing a shelf-stable product and commercial production, the spectrum and efficacy on a larger scale of the B-241 strain should be determined, and its efficacy in combination with commercial biofungicides and fungicides tested in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available