4.7 Article

Enhanced two consecutive samples based de-modulation technique for atomic force microscopy application

Journal

MEASUREMENT
Volume 223, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113731

Keywords

Amplitude estimation; Atomic force microscopy; Delayed signal cancellation operators; Lyapunov's de-modulator; Moving average filter (MAF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article investigates robust amplitude detectors suitable for atomic force microscopy (AFM) while discussing better alternatives. Two efficient approaches leveraging Lyapunov's theory for noise suppression and DC-offset rejection are suggested, and an enhanced two samples-based Lyapunov's demodulation approach is proposed for rapid amplitude detection.
This article investigates robust amplitude detectors suitable for atomic force microscopy (AFM) while discussing better alternatives. An AFM instrument's measurement unit is responsible for providing the amplitude informa-tion obtained from the tip of a cantilever beam to identify the surface smoothness of a test material. Therefore, two efficient approaches are suggested to leverage Lyapunov's theory while adhering to better noise suppression and DC-offset rejection capabilities. Nevertheless, an enhanced two samples-based Lyapunov's demodulation approach is proposed to detect the amplitude information rapidly. Consequently, the modifications applied to the conventional method help reduce the tuning efforts and structural complications. The proposed solution remains structurally simpler and useful for high-and low-frequency probes. Furthermore, the extensive design guidelines for all techniques and the simulation results are presented. Different amplitude signals are synthetically generated from several rough pseudo-test surfaces for early verification and sent to a real-time digital controller to judge the proposal's efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available