4.7 Article

Photosynthetic biogas upgrading to bio-methane: Boosting nutrient recovery via biomass productivity control

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.04.017

Keywords

Biogas upgrading; Bio-methane; Microalgae-based processes; Nutrients recovery; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. MINECO [CTM2015-70442-R]
  2. MINECO (Red Novedar)
  3. Regional Government of Castilla y Leon [VA024U14, UIC 71]
  4. INIA [RTA2013-00056-C03-02]
  5. Postdoctoral grant of Alma Toledo [237873]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A pilot high rate algal pond (HRAP) interconnected to an external CO2-H2S absorption column via settled broth recirculation was used to simultaneously treat a synthetic digestate and to upgrade biogas to a bio-methane with sufficient quality to be injected into natural gas grids. An innovative HRAP operational strategy with biomass recirculation based on the control of algal-bacterial biomass productivity (2.2, 4.4 and 7.5 g m(-2) d(-1)) via settled biomass wastage was evaluated in order to enhance nutrient recovery from digestate at a constant hydraulic retention time. The influence of the recycling liquid to biogas (L/G) ratio on the quality of the upgraded biogas was assessed. The bio-methane composition under a L/G ratio of 1 (0.4 +/- 0.1% CO2, 0.03 +/- 0.04% O-2, 2.4 +/- 0.2% N-2 and 97.2 +/- 0.2% CH4) complied with the technical specifications of most European bio-methane legislations regardless of the biomass productivity established. The HRAP operational strategy applied allowed increasing the N and P recovery from 19 and 22% to 83 and 100%, respectively, when the biomass productivity was increased from 2.2 to 7.5 g m(-2) d(-1). Finally, the dynamics of microalgae and bacteria population structure were characterized by morphological identification and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available