4.6 Article

The emergence of the EEG dominant rhythm across the first year of life

Journal

CEREBRAL CORTEX
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhad425

Keywords

infancy; EEG; dominant rhythm; peak frequency; visual processing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the development of dominant rhythm frequency in infants during a sustained attention task. The results show that the peak frequency increases from 6 to 9 to 12 months of age in response to faces and objects. The center of gravity (CoG) is found to be a robust index of brain development in infancy.
The spectral composition of EEG provides important information on the function of the developing brain. For example, the frequency of the dominant rhythm, a salient features of EEG data, increases from infancy to adulthood. Changes of the dominant rhythm during infancy are yet to be fully characterized, in terms of their developmental trajectory and spectral characteristics. In this study, the development of dominant rhythm frequency was examined during a novel sustained attention task across 6-month-old (n = 39), 9-month-old (n = 30), and 12-month-old (n = 28) infants. During this task, computer-generated objects and faces floated down a computer screen for 10 s after a 5-second fixation cross. The peak frequency in the range between 5 and 9 Hz was calculated using center of gravity (CoG) and examined in response to faces and objects. Results indicated that peak frequency increased from 6 to 9 to 12 months of age in face and object conditions. We replicated the same result for the baseline. There was high reliability between the CoGs in the face, object, and baseline conditions across all channels. The developmental increase in CoG was more reliable than measures of mode frequency across different conditions. These findings suggest that CoG is a robust index of brain development across infancy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available