4.0 Article

The effects of switching from ceftriaxone to cefotaxime on the occurrence of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial

Journal

INFECTIOUS DISEASES NOW
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.idnow.2023.104806

Keywords

Ceftriaxone; Third-generation cephalosporins; Enterobacterales; Antimicrobial stewardship; Antimicrobial resistance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of replacing ceftriaxone with cefotaxime on the incidence of third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GC-RE). The results showed that replacing ceftriaxone with cefotaxime reduced the occurrence of 3GC-RE isolates.
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of the replacement of ceftriaxone by cefotaxime on the incidence of third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GC-RE).Patients and methods: We conducted a 24-month monocentric prospective, stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. During the control phase of the study, clinicians prescribed either ceftriaxone or cefotaxime. During the intervention phase, they systematically prescribed cefotaxime. Results: The cefotaxime/ceftriaxone ratio was inversely correlated with the incidence of 3GC-RE. All in all, 3GCRE incidence was 1.05 (27/25,692) acquired cases/1000 hospitalization days during the control phase and 0.54 (11/20,419) acquired cases/1000 hospitalization days during the intervention phase (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.51 [0.22-1.07], p = 0.06). In multivariable analysis, intervention phase (versus control phase) (p = 0.007), cefotaxime/ceftriaxone ratio (p = 0.003) and imported 3GC-RE (p = 0.005) were associated with the incidence of acquired cases of 3GC-RE.Conclusions: We found that replacing ceftriaxone with cefotaxime reduced the occurrence of 3GC-RE isolates. More studies are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available