4.4 Article

Development of Phormia regina at seven constant temperatures for minimum postmortem interval estimation

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00414-023-03120-z

Keywords

Forensic entomology; Phormia regina; Development; Postmortem interval

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of forensic entomological evidence using P. regina and provide developmental models for accurate estimation of the minimum postmortem interval.
Phormia regina (Meigen, 1826) (Diptera: Calliphoridae) can colonize carcasses quickly, and its immature stages are reliable entomological evidence for the estimation of the minimum postmortem interval (PMImin). There are discrepancies in the developmental data from previous studies on P. regina, and the related PMI(min )indicators need to be refined. We investigated the accuracy of forensic entomological evidence using development durations, growth accumulated degree hours, and larval body length variations of P. regina at seven constant temperatures ranging from 16 to 34 degrees C. We also established development models such as the isomorphen diagram, thermal summation model, isomegalen diagram, and body length simulation equation to assist with PMImin estimation. The developmental duration of P. regina from egg to adult at 16, 19, 22, 25, 28, 31, and 34 degrees C was 840.8 +/- 42.8 h, 580.1 +/- 10.1 h, 390.4 +/- 8.7 h, 316.8 +/- 9.4 h, 291.4 +/- 21.2 h, 238.4 +/- 2.8 h, and 222.5 +/- 5.2 h, respectively. The lower threshold temperature T-L was 9.97 +/- 0.50 degrees C, while the thermal constant K was 5052.7 +/- 229 degree days. The lower developmental thresholds, intrinsic optimum temperature, and upper lethal developmental threshold obtained by the Optim SSI models were 13.15, 21.20, and 36.86 degrees C, respectively. This study aims to provide developmental models for P. regina aimed at common case-site temperatures in the northern provinces of China, which can be used for accurate PMImin estimation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available