4.6 Article

Plant hormones mediate the interaction between oak acorn germination and rodent hoarding behaviour

Journal

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.19424

Keywords

oak; plant hormones; scatter hoarding; seed germination; seed-rodent interaction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The interaction between animals and plants in seed dispersal and predation has a significant impact on seed germination and rodent hoarding behavior. The study found that acorns quickly germinate when consumed by rodents, and rodents can recognize the germination status of acorns for hoarding purposes. Gibberellin and abscisic acid may play important roles in regulating seed germination and rodent hoarding behavior.
The interaction between animals and plants for seed dispersal and predation has received much attention; however, the underlying physiological mechanisms driving the responses of both seeds and animals remain unclear.We conducted a series of behaviour and physiology experiments to examine the role of plant hormones in regulating seed germination and rodent hoarding behaviour in the Quercus variabilis and Leopoldamys edwardsi systems.We found that acorns that were partially consumed by rodents had increased gibberellin (GA) levels and shortened germination time. Rodents preferred scatter-hoarded abscisic acid (ABA)-treated and intact acorns but consumed germinated and GA-treated acorns; such treatment differences disappeared for inactivated acorns by boiling water. Moreover, we found that seven potential compounds may be linked to seed germination and rodent hoarding behaviour.Our results indicate that acorns of oak showed rapid germination when facing predation risk, while rodents could identify the germination status of seeds for hoarding; GA and ABA may play an important role in regulating seed germination of oak and hoarding behaviour of rodents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available