4.5 Review

A systematic meta-review of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Journal

EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 66, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2451

Keywords

Child and adolescent psychiatry; ADHD; Systematic reviews; Epidemiology; Public Health

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the numerous systematic reviews on ADHD, many key questions remain unanswered. Gaps exist in evidence regarding the prevalence of ADHD, causal relationships of documented risk factors, efficacy of treatments, and the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy in mitigating adverse outcomes associated with ADHD.
BackgroundThere are now hundreds of systematic reviews on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) of variable quality. To help navigate this literature, we have reviewed systematic reviews on any topic on ADHD.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and performed quality assessment according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis. A total of 231 systematic reviews and meta-analyses met the eligibility criteria.ResultsThe prevalence of ADHD was 7.2% for children and adolescents and 2.5% for adults, though with major uncertainty due to methodological variation in the existing literature. There is evidence for both biological and social risk factors for ADHD, but this evidence is mostly correlational rather than causal due to confounding and reverse causality. There is strong evidence for the efficacy of pharmacological treatment on symptom reduction in the short-term, particularly for stimulants. However, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in mitigating adverse life trajectories such as educational attainment, employment, substance abuse, injuries, suicides, crime, and comorbid mental and somatic conditions. Pharmacotherapy is linked with side effects like disturbed sleep, reduced appetite, and increased blood pressure, but less is known about potential adverse effects after long-term use. Evidence of the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments is mixed.ConclusionsDespite hundreds of systematic reviews on ADHD, key questions are still unanswered. Evidence gaps remain as to a more accurate prevalence of ADHD, whether documented risk factors are causal, the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatments on any outcomes, and pharmacotherapy in mitigating the adverse outcomes associated with ADHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available