4.6 Article

Influence of Oxygen and Mediators on Laccase-Catalyzed Polymerization of Lignosulfonate

Journal

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages 5303-5310

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00692

Keywords

Lignosulfonate; Laccase; Oxidation; Polymerization; Natural and synthetic mediators; Continuous oxygen supply

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy
  2. Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology ACIB GmbH
  3. Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG) [3038341]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Industrial utilization of lignin is of high interest since it represents around 30% of all nonfossil-based carbon sources worldwide. For various applications of lignosulfonates such as for dispersants or adhesives a larger molecular weight is essential. Here, we investigated laccase-catalyzed polymerization of lignosulfonate directly from the pulp and paper industry in the presence and absence of natural and synthetic mediators with and without oxygen supply. For example, laccase-mediated polymerization in the presence of a 2.5 mM TEMPO as mediator with a 10 cm(3) min(-1) oxygen flow rate led to a 12-fold increase of the molecular weight, while without TEMPO a 13-fold increase was achieved. In contrast, without an external oxygen supply, only a 7-fold increase in molecular weight was achieved compared to a 4-fold increase for the TEMPO-laccase system. Fluorescence intensity, phenol content, and size exclusion chromatography measurements indicate that generally in the presence of high concentrations of mediators, such as TEMPO, vanillin, HBT, and 2,6-dimethoxyphenol, oxidation of other structural units in lignosulfonates may counteract desired polymerization reactions. In summary, for laccase-catalyzed polymerization of lignosulfonates, an external oxygen supply was found to be much more beneficial than the presence of laccase mediators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available