4.7 Article

The nonlinear dependence of income inequality and carbon emissions: Potentials for a sustainable future

Journal

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS
Volume 216, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108016

Keywords

Bivariate distributional copula model; Income inequality; Carbon emission; Social sustainability; Ecological sustainability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the interconnected nature of rising carbon emissions and income inequality is crucial to achieve social and ecological sustainability. The distributional copula model used in this study uncovers complex interdependencies that standard linear regression techniques might hide.
Understanding the interconnected nature of rising carbon emissions and income inequality is crucial to achieve social and ecological sustainability. We contribute to the literature with a systematic analysis of the conditional interdependence by means of a distributional copula model. The model estimates the nonlinear dependence between a country's GINI coefficient and CO2 emissions across and within country income groups. This enables us to uncover complex interdependencies that standard linear regression techniques might hide. Using an unbalanced panel data set of 109 countries from 1960 to 2019, composed of different data sets, we show that dependence is related to the prevailing consumption level, energy sources, the structure of the economy and the political system with heterogeneous effects across country income groups. To estimate the potentials for a sustainable future, we define thresholds of potential social and environmental sustainability. We find that richer countries are furthest away from this, but have the highest potential for realizing the defined sustainable space. This further highlights the importance of the service sector and combined policies targeting social and environmental sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available