4.5 Article

The level of agreement between the numerical rating scale and visual analogue scale for assessing pain intensity in adults with chronic pain

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Anesthesiology

Heart rate variability is not suitable as a surrogate marker for pain intensity in patients with chronic pain

Maarten Moens et al.

Summary: The search for a biomarker for pain has been ongoing for decades, but no widely accepted biomarker has been identified. This study explored the use of heart rate variability (HRV) as a surrogate marker for pain intensity in chronic pain patients. The study found weak correlations between HRV parameters and pain intensity scores, suggesting that HRV parameters are not suitable as surrogate candidates for pain intensity. Further research is needed to identify potential surrogate markers and true endpoints for the highly individual pain experience.
Review Clinical Neurology

Optimizing and Accelerating the Development of Precision Pain Treatments for Chronic Pain: IMMPACT Review and Recommendations

Robert R. Edwards et al.

Summary: There is a large variability in individual response to pain treatments, even those that are highly effective, which has led to calls for personalized approaches to treating patients with pain. Precision pain medicine aims to determine the optimal treatments for specific patients by using empirically based algorithms. This review surveys the current state of precision pain medicine and presents evidence-based recommendations for its application in chronic pain research.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2023)

Article Anesthesiology

Reliability and responsivity of pain intensity scales in individuals with chronic pain

Pramote Euasobhon et al.

Summary: This study examined the stability and validity of four commonly used pain intensity scales (VAS, VRS-6, NRS-11, FPS-R). The results showed that NRS-11 and VAS had better test-retest stability, and NRS-11 demonstrated the highest sensitivity. FPS-R could be considered as an alternative for individuals who may have difficulty understanding or using NRS-11.
Article Clinical Neurology

VAS and NRS, Same or Different? Are Visual Analog Scale Values and Numerical Rating Scale Equally Viable Tools for Assessing Patients after Microdiscectomy?

Joanna Bielewicz et al.

Summary: This study compared the viability of the numerical rating scale (NRS) and the visual analogue scale (VAS) as pain assessment tools among patients who underwent microdiscectomy. The results showed that NRS-L and NRS-B ratings remained at a similar level while VAS and ODI decreased after 3 months. The measurement of NRS-L 1 month after microdiscectomy seems to give quick insight into the effectiveness of the procedure.

PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

Initial Content Validation and Roadmap for a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Pain Intensity

Dale J. Langford et al.

Summary: Measures of pain intensity, such as numeric rating scales (NRS), have limitations in terms of standardization, which undermines the precision and comparability of pain assessment. This study used concept elicitation interviews to gather patients' perspectives and suggestions on pain intensity measurement. The findings informed the development of initial candidate measures that adhere to FDA qualification processes.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2022)

Review Neurosciences

A literature review of the impact of exclusion criteria on generalizability of clinical trial findings to patients with chronic pain

Vafi Salmasi et al.

Summary: The use of exclusion criteria in clinical trials may limit the generalizability of study results. There is a lack of research on the impact of exclusion criteria on chronic pain patients, highlighting the need for more comprehensive studies to better understand these implications.

PAIN REPORTS (2022)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Rescaling pain intensity measures for meta-analyses of analgesic medicines for low back pain appears justified: an empirical examination from randomised trials

Michael A. Wewege et al.

Summary: Rescaling pain intensity measures may be justified in meta-analyses of analgesic medicines for low back pain, as the observed differences are small and randomly distributed.

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

I. Indices of Pain Intensity Derived From Ecological Momentary Assessments: Rationale and Stakeholder Preferences

Arthur A. Stone et al.

Summary: Pain assessment is essential for chronic pain research and management, and considering additional outcome measures capturing temporal aspects of pain can enhance pain assessment. Different stakeholders have distinct preferences for additional pain indices, with patients favoring Worst Pain and Time in High Pain. Multiple temporal aspects of pain intensity are important to stakeholders and should be considered in evaluating the efficacy of pain management.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2021)

Article Anesthesiology

Cut-off points between pain intensities of the postoperative pain using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

Sooyoung Cho et al.

Summary: Pain assessment tools including VAS, NRS, and FPS-R showed high consistency in postoperative settings, providing valuable insights on determining appropriate cutoff points for pain medication use.

BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Michael C. Ferraro et al.

Summary: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of antidepressant medicines for low back pain, finding that antidepressants have a small effect on reducing pain intensity but increase the odds of stopping treatment, affecting acceptability.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2021)

Article Clinical Neurology

Validity and Utility of Four Pain Intensity Measures for Use in International Research

Raviwon Atisook et al.

Summary: The study evaluated four commonly used measures of pain intensity in Thai patients with chronic pain, finding NRS-11 to be the most useful in the sample and suggesting that FPS-R might be most suitable for cross-cultural and international research based on comparisons with findings from other countries. Further research in developing countries is needed to assess the generalizability of the current findings.

JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH (2021)

Review Neurosciences

Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations

Jennifer S. Gewandter et al.

Summary: This article discusses the design considerations for clinical trials investigating the prevention of chronic pain, including subject identification, timing and duration of treatment, outcomes, timing of assessment, and adjusting for risk factors in the analyses. By examining four models of chronic pain prevention, improvements in trial design could potentially decrease the prevalence of chronic pain in the population.

PAIN REPORTS (2021)

Article Clinical Neurology

Beyond Average: Providers' Assessments of Indices for Measuring Pain Intensity in Patients With Chronic Pain

Roberta E. E. Goldman et al.

Summary: This study investigated healthcare providers' perspectives on seven pain measurement indices for capturing pain intensity. Despite concerns regarding visual analog and numeric rating scales, almost all providers used them. The importance ratings of the pain indices showed that worst pain was rated as the most important, followed by average pain, and unpredictable pain was rated the lowest.

FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH (2021)

Review Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Chronic Pain: Structural and Functional Changes in Brain Structures and Associated Negative Affective States

Seoyon Yang et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES (2019)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation

Mohammad Hassan Murad et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)

Review Emergency Medicine

A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?

Ozgur Karcioglu et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE (2018)

Article Clinical Neurology

The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure?

Ivan S. K. Thong et al.

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PAIN (2018)

Article Clinical Neurology

Demographic Predictors of Pain Sensitivity: Results From the OPPERA Study

Cara Ostrom et al.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2017)

Article Anesthesiology

Preferred Presentation of the Visual Analog Scale for Measurement of Postoperative Pain

Helle Birgitte Kjeldsen et al.

PAIN PRACTICE (2016)

Article Clinical Neurology

Assessment of Chronic Pain: Domains, Methods, and Mechanisms

Roger B. Fillingim et al.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2016)

Article Rehabilitation

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

Terry K. Koo et al.

JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE (2016)

Article Emergency Medicine

A COMPARISON OF THREE SELF-REPORT PAIN SCALES IN ADULTS WITH ACUTE PAIN

Maryam Bahreini et al.

JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE (2015)

Article Psychology, Mathematical

Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes: a multilevel approach

Wim Van den Noortgate et al.

BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2015)

Article Anesthesiology

A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6-to 8-year-old children

Elisabet Sanchez-Rodriguez et al.

Article Anesthesiology

Validity of four pain intensity rating scales

Maria Alexandra Ferreira-Valente et al.

Review Mathematical & Computational Biology

Pooling health-related quality of life outcomes in meta-analysis-a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability

Kristian Thorlund et al.

RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2011)

Article Critical Care Medicine

Comparison of different pain scoring systems in critically ill patients in a general ICU

Sabine J. G. M. Ahlers et al.

CRITICAL CARE (2008)

Review Nursing

Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales

A Williamson et al.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING (2005)