3.8 Article

Victorian Facebooks: Privacy Concerns at William Notman's Studio

Journal

HISTORY OF PHOTOGRAPHY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03087298.2023.2266945

Keywords

privacy; photography studios; William Notman (1826-91); portraits; nineteenth century; Canada

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article argues that concerns about privacy in relation to photography existed before the emergence of amateur photography. By citing notations from famed photographer William Notman's records, the article suggests that privacy issues were present in the daily operations of photography studios. The article speculates that these concerns were influenced by the marketing practices of early photography studios and this analysis aims to trace current debates about privacy, photography, and visibility back to the commercial systems developed alongside early photography technologies.
The history of issues of privacy in relation to photography is generally dated to the introduction of handheld cameras and halftone printing at the end of the nineteenth century. Citing a remarkable series of notations in the records of famed Montreal photographer William Notman, this article argues that privacy concerns were at issue in the everyday operations of the photography studios that preceded amateur photography. These notations represent the rudimentary attempts that some of Notman's clients made to restrict the circulation, sale and availability of their studio portraits starting in the 1870s. This article speculates that the emergent anxieties regarding privacy exemplified by such notations were informed by the setup and marketing practices of early photography studios. Ultimately, this analysis seeks to show that current debates about privacy, photography and visibility can be traced back to the commercial systems that developed in tandem with early photography technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available