4.6 Article

Resveratrol, ε-Viniferin, and Vitisin B from Vine: Comparison of Their In Vitro Antioxidant Activities and Study of Their Interactions

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 28, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28227521

Keywords

stilbenes; resveratrol; epsilon-viniferin; vitisin B; interactions; antioxidant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The control of oxidative stress with natural active substances is important in limiting the development of diseases. Resveratrol showed the highest antiradical activity among the tested substances, followed by epsilon-viniferin and vitisin B. Different combinations of these substances displayed additive or synergistic effects, depending on the assay method used.
The control of oxidative stress with natural active substances could limit the development of numerous pathologies. Our objective was to study the antiradical effects of resveratrol (RSV), epsilon-viniferin (VNF), and vitisin B (VB) alone or in combination, and those of a standardized stilbene-enriched vine extract (SSVE). In the DPPH-, FRAP-, and NO-scavenging assays, RSV presented the highest activity with an IC50 of 81.92 +/- 9.17, 13.36 +/- 0.91, and 200.68 +/- 15.40 mu M, respectively. All binary combinations resulted in additive interactions in the DPPH- and NO-scavenging assays. In the FRAP assay, a synergic interaction for RSV + VNF, an additive for VNF + VB, and an antagonistic for RSV + VB were observed. The ternary combination of RSV + VNF + VB elicited an additive interaction in the DPPH assay and a synergic interaction in the FRAP- and NO-scavenging assays. There was no significant difference between the antioxidant activity of the SSVE and that of the combination of RSV + VNF. In conclusion, RSV presented the highest effects, followed by VNF and VB. The interactions revealed additive or synergistic effects, depending on the combination of the stilbenes and assay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available