4.7 Article

Instability thresholds for penetrative porous convection with variable viscosity fluids

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2023.107056

Keywords

Variable viscosity; Porous medium; Penetrative convection; Linear instability; Density-maximum; Galerkin method

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comprehensive investigation was conducted to study the impact of viscosity-temperature variations on porous penetrative convection. The analysis revealed that the combination of variable viscosity and density-maximum characteristic expedited the onset of porous convection and reduced the size of convection cells.
A comprehensive investigation discerning different viscosity-temperature variations on the onset of porous penetrative convection modeled through quadratic density-temperature law is undertaken. The fluid viscosity is assumed to vary linearly, quadratically and exponentially with temperature. The variable viscosity results in a coupling between stream function and temperature in the Darcy momentum balance equation. The linear instability of the basic state is analyzed numerically by examining small-amplitude disturbances in velocity and temperature fields. By carrying out numerical computations for a wide range of parametric regimes, it is established that the principle of exchange of stabilities (PES) is valid. The critical values of the Darcy-Rayleigh number and of the wave number are obtained. The analysis reveals that the combined influence of variable viscosity and the density-maximum characteristic is to expedite the onset of porous convection much faster compared to their isolation presence. The size of the convection cell decreases with an increase in the Darcy-modified Rayleigh number linked to the quadratic density variant. The outcomes obtained under the limiting cases are shown to exhibit consistency with previously published findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available