Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses
Mia Schmidt-Hansen et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE (2020)
Early provision of intrauterine contraception as part of abortion care-5-year results of a randomised controlled trial
Elina Pohjoranta et al.
HUMAN REPRODUCTION (2020)
Free-of-charge long-acting reversible contraception: two-year discontinuation, its risk factors, and reasons
Tuire H. Saloranta et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990-2019
Jonathan Bearak et al.
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH (2020)
How reliable are health registers? Registration of induced abortions and sterilizations in Finland
Anna Heino et al.
INFORMATICS FOR HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE (2018)
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Free of Charge, Method Initiation, and Abortion Rates in Finland
Frida Gyllenberg et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH (2018)
Interpregnancy Interval After Termination of Pregnancy and the Risks of Adverse Outcomes in Subsequent Birth
Jaana Mannisto et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2017)
Preventing Unintended Pregnancy: The Contraceptive CHOICE Project in Review
Natalia E. Birgisson et al.
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH (2015)
Medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy in primigravid womenis the next delivery differently at risk? A population-based register study
J. Mannisto et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2013)
Frequency and Risk Factors for Repeat Abortions After Surgical Compared With Medical Termination of Pregnancy
Maarit Niinimaki et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2009)
Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion
Oskari Heikinheimo et al.
CONTRACEPTION (2008)
Share Paper
