4.6 Article

Physical-Mechanical Behavior of CDW and Tire Flake Integration in Building Block Manufacturing

Journal

SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 15, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su152115418

Keywords

Portland cement-based blocks; CDW; tire flakes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this investigation was to reduce the consumption of geomaterials in block manufacturing by using construction and demolition waste as a substitute for gravel and tire flakes as a substitute for sand. The results show that the addition of tire flakes decreased the blocks' performance and increased costs, while the incorporation of construction and demolition waste achieved a performance close to that of the control blocks and presented improvements in the modulus of elasticity.
Among the construction products manufactured with Portland cement (PC) are (in addition to hydraulic concrete) construction blocks. These elements are used as masonry materials for the elaboration of walls in all types of construction. For the elaboration of these elements, large amounts of geomaterials such as sand are utilized. The aim of this investigation was to reduce the consumption of geomaterials using block manufacturing that incorporates construction and demolition waste as a substitute for gravel and tire flakes as a substitute for sand. These blocks were characterized by their resistance in a compression test, flexion, modulus of elasticity, electrical resistivity, moisture absorption, and MEB microscopy, as well as an analysis of the unit price for different mixtures. The results show that the addition of tire flakes severely decreased the blocks' physical-mechanical performance and increased the production costs, while the incorporation of 50% construction and demolition waste achieved a performance very close to that of the control blocks and presented improvements in the modulus of elasticity, although the costs could be higher than those for the control blocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available