Journal
ANNALS OF ANATOMY-ANATOMISCHER ANZEIGER
Volume 251, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2023.152182
Keywords
Collaborative learning; Self-assessment ability; Academic performance; Anatomy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the impact of online learning conditions on the oral exam performance of medical students. The results showed that students who used collaborative learning strategies were able to assess their abilities more realistically. However, the learning strategies did not have an impact on exam results.
Background: In 2021, university teaching at the Faculty of Medicine Tuebingen was transferred to a digital setting. Due to the discontinuation of face-to-face teaching, students lacked the temporal and spatial framework of the curriculum and the possibility to socialise with fellow students was extremely limited. Increased demands were placed on the students' self-organisation, and the possibility of collaborative learning was drastically limited. The present study investigated the extent to which these study conditions affected the academic performance of medical students in the oral exam after the 60-hour introductory anatomy lecture. Specifically, collaborative, and organisational learning strategies were considered.Methods: Learning strategies of 146 students were assessed by means of a questionnaire. The anatomy exam was used to assess the academic performance. In addition, students were asked to rate their own oral exam performance.Results: Students used strategies of collaborative learning (M = 3.30, SD = 0.88) and self-organisation (M = 3.28, SD = 0.72) about equally as often. A significant correlation was found between the use of collaborative learning strategies and the ability for realistic self-assessment (rho =-0.22, P =.02). Collaborative behaviour could be divided into Initiative Collaborative Learning and Subordinate Collaborative Learning. Only the former had an influence on the ability for realistic self-assessment. Neither organisational learning strategies nor collaborative learning strategies had an influence on academic performance.Discussion and conclusion: Initiative collaborative learners showed a higher degree of realistic self-assessment. This could be explained through a more distinct social referencing, as fellow students' knowledge levels can be related early on to their own academic performance. There was no correlation between the learning strategies used and the exam result.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available