4.7 Article

A dynamic test scenario generation method for autonomous vehicles based on conditional generative adversarial imitation learning

Journal

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107279

Keywords

Autonomous vehicles; Conditional generative adversarial imitation; learning; Dynamic test scenario

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a dynamic test scenario generation method for comprehensive evaluation of autonomous vehicles. By simulating the interaction process between the autonomous vehicle and environmental vehicles, the method can test the autonomous vehicle's ability to cope with dynamic scenarios and reveal its weaknesses.
Autonomous vehicles must be comprehensively evaluated before deployed in cities and highways. However, most existing evaluation approaches for autonomous vehicles are static and model environmental vehicles with predefined trajectories, which ignore the time-sequential interactions between the ego vehicle and environmental vehicles. In this paper, we propose a dynamic test scenario generation method to evaluate autonomous vehicles by modeling environmental vehicles as agents with human behavior and simulating the interaction process between the autonomous vehicle and environmental vehicles. Considering the multimodal features of traffic scenarios, we cluster the real-word traffic environments, and integrate the scenario class labels into the conditional generative adversarial imitation learning (CGAIL) model to generate different types of traffic scenarios. The proposed method is validated in a typical lane-change scenario that involves frequent interactions between ego vehicle and environmental vehicles. Results show that the proposed method further test autonomous vehicles' ability to cope with dynamic scenarios, and can be used to infer the weaknesses of the tested vehicles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available