3.8 Article

The effect of inappropriate patient centring on CT numbers and radiation dose: A survey of current practices and knowledge

Journal

RADIOGRAPHY
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 100-106

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.10.009

Keywords

Current practices and knowledge; Patient off-centring; Radiation dose; CT number; Accuracy; Australian radiographers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports on the current practice and knowledge accuracy of Australian radiographers regarding inappropriate patient centring during CT. The results show inconsistent practices and knowledge gaps among radiographers, highlighting the importance of continuous professional development programs to improve patient positioning accuracy and dose management.
Introduction: Patient positioning is known to impact CT number and patient dose. The aim of this study was to report current practice and the accuracy of the knowledge of radiographers in Australia regarding inappropriate patient centring during CT.Methods: A survey of members of the Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy (ASMIRT) was undertaken. The survey consisted of 36 questions about patient off-centring, CT number accuracy, and radiation dose. The survey was open from May to August 2021 and directed toward diagnostic radiographers with CT experience. Responses were evaluated as correct or incorrect based on evidence-based knowledge and theoretical definitions.Results: Among 186 participants, a majority of 75.7 % followed the manufacturer's recommended guidelines for localiser radiographs direction. Despite higher radiation dose to anteriorly located radiosensitive organs, 63.64 % preferred the anterior-posterior (AP) localiser. Only 21.93 % agreed that localiser direction would definitely affect radiation dose if the patient was inappropriately centred. A knowledge-practice disparity is evident as 45.77 % rarely or never reviewed CT numbers post-image acquisition, even though 92.8 % acknowledged their significance on prognosis and clinical decisions. Significant discrepancies in the accuracy of responses were identified; inaccuracies were dependent on CT qualifications (p = 0.0199), experience (p = 0.0397), and workload (p = 0.0360). Knowledge gaps existed regarding factors affecting patient centring and its impact on radiation dose and CT numbers. Conclusion: This study highlights inconsistent CT practices and knowledge gaps among Australian radiographers. Given the impact of inaccurate positioning on radiation dose and CT number, engagement with continuous professional development programs that focus on the importance of patient positioning and the utilisation of the latest advancements in dose management tools is urgently needed.Implications for practice: Where radiographers do not possess the necessary theoretical knowledge and understanding to maximise patient positioning accuracy to optimise dose and CT number accuracy, then patients may receive an unnecessary dose. Inaccurate CT number accuracy may lead to misdiagnosis or inaccurate delivery of treatment.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available