4.2 Article

Front Is High and Back Is Low: Sound-Space Iconicity in Finnish

Journal

LANGUAGE AND SPEECH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/00238309231214176

Keywords

Spatial language; sound symbolism; speech; vowel production

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous investigations have revealed interactions between spatial concepts and speech sounds. This study examines whether the concepts of forward/front and backward/back are associated with high- and low-pitched vocalizations in Finnish. The results indicate that high-pitched vocalization is linked to forward-directed movement, while low-pitched vocalization is linked to backward-directed movement. This observation suggests a novel sound-space symbolism phenomenon.
Previous investigations have shown various interactions between spatial concepts and speech sounds. For instance, the front-high vowel [i] is associated with the concept of forward, and the back-high vowel [o] is associated with the concept of backward. Three experiments investigated whether the concepts of forward/front and backward/back are associated with high- and low-pitched vocalizations, respectively, in Finnish. In Experiments 1 and 2, the participants associated the high-pitched vocalization with the forward-directed movement and the low-pitched vocalizations with the backward-directed movement. In Experiment 3, the same effect was observed in relation to the concepts of front of and back of. We propose that these observations present a novel sound-space symbolism phenomenon in which spatial concepts of forward/front and backward/back are iconically associated with high- and low-pitched speech sounds. This observation is discussed in relation to the grounding of semantic knowledge of these spatial concepts in the movements of articulators such as relative front/back-directed movements of the tongue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available