4.4 Article

Offence versatility among co-offenders: A dynamic network analysis

Journal

SOCIAL NETWORKS
Volume 78, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2023.10.003

Keywords

Co-offending; Relational hyperevent models; Crime

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the dynamics of co-offending and its relationship with crime categories. The research findings show that compared to solo offenders, groups of co-offenders are more likely to engage in crime events involving multiple crime categories. Additionally, there is evidence of differential association and social learning in market and property crime within the context of co-offending.
Research examining co-offending has become increasingly popular over the last two decades. Despite this, there remains a dearth of research examining the dynamics of co-offending across time, largely due to limited access to longitudinal data. In the current paper we are interested in explaining crime versatility, and therefore we employ Relational Hyperevent Models (RHEM) to model the conditional probability that a given group of co-offenders engages in one set of crime categories rather than another. Thus, we are analyzing a two-mode network (actors by crime categories) and explain, conditional on a given group of co-offenders, their participation in the set of specific crime types involved in a particular crime event. With respect to co-offending, results reveal that, compared with solo offenders, groups of two or more co-offenders are more likely to engage in crime events involving more than just one crime category. Results suggest that in the context of co-offending both market and property crime show evidence of differential association and social learning. Naive partners in co-offending partnerships learn the skills and knowledge needed to participate in co-offending involving market and property crime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available