Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Smarter ways to capture carbon dioxide-exploring alternatives for small to medium-scale carbon capture in Kraft pulp mills
Adrian Lefvert et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL (2023)
What are the potential paths for carbon capture and storage in Sweden? A multi-level assessment of historical and current developments
Adrian Lefvert et al.
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE (2022)
Tensions in the energy transition: Swedish and Finnish company perspectives on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage
Emily Rodriguez et al.
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION (2021)
Is carbon dioxide removal 'mitigation of climate change'?
Matthias Honegger et al.
REVIEW OF EUROPEAN COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW (2021)
Potential and challenges of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage as a carbon-negative energy source: A review
Alexandre Babin et al.
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY (2021)
Incentivising bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) responsibly: Comparing stakeholder policy preferences in the United Kingdom and Sweden
Rob Bellamy et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY (2021)
The BECCS Implementation Gap-A Swedish Case Study
Sabine Fuss et al.
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH (2021)
Can biomass supply meet the demands of bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)?
Michael B. Jones et al.
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY (2020)
EMF-33 insights on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
Matteo Muratori et al.
CLIMATIC CHANGE (2020)
Mapping Multi-Level Policy Incentives for Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage in Sweden
Mathias Fridahl et al.
FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE (2020)
When are negative emissions negative emissions?
Samantha Eleanor Tanzer et al.
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE (2019)
Negative emissions-Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects
Sabine Fuss et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Evaluating the use of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage in low emission scenarios
Naomi E. Vaughan et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2018)
Investment costs and CO2 reduction potential of carbon capture from industrial plants - A Swedish case study
Stefania Osk Gardarsdottir et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL (2018)
Alternative pathways to the 1.5°C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies
Detlef P. van Vuuren et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2018)
Classifying drivers of global forest loss
Philip G. Curtis et al.
SCIENCE (2018)
Bioenergy production and sustainable development: science base for policymaking remains limited
Carmenza Robledo-Abad et al.
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY (2017)
Carbon dioxide removal and the futures market
D'Maris Coffman et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2017)
The neglected importance of corporate perceptions and positions for the long-term development of CCS
Lukas Braunreiter et al.
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13 (2017)
Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions
Pete Smith et al.
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2016)
Ship transport-A low cost and low risk CO2 transport option in the Nordic countries
Jan Kjarstad et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL (2016)
The trouble with negative emissions
Kevin Anderson et al.
SCIENCE (2016)
Bio-CCS: feasibility comparison of large scale carbon-negative solutions
Antti Arasto et al.
12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-12 (2014)
Obstacles for CCS deployment: an analysis of discrepancies of perceptions
Peter Stigson et al.
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE (2012)
Sequestration of fermentation CO2 from ethanol production
HS Kheshgi et al.
ENERGY (2005)
Potential market niches for biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage - Opportunities for energy supply with negative CO2 emissions
K Mollersten et al.
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY (2003)