4.5 Article

Deformation of palmar hand measurements in a power grip by wrist ulnar/ radial deviation

Journal

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104157

Keywords

Grip design; Palmar hand dimensions; Power grip; Wrist posture; Deformation; Measurement protocol; Scanning; Casting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study measured 12 palmar dimensions to analyze the impact of wrist posture on hand size changes during power grip. The findings showed that hand dimensions decreased significantly during grip, with wrist posture and finger position also exerting significant effects on hand size.
Objectives: The present study analyzed changes in palmar hand measurements during power grip by wrist radial/ ulnar deviation for an ergonomic grip design.Method: Twelve palmar dimensions (Tip-to-PTC/DTC distances, Tip-to-MMC distances, and Tip-to-MMC surface lengths) of digits 2 to 5 were measured for 30 Koreans with various hand sizes (15 males and 15 females; hand length = 177.9 +/- 12.3 mm) at three wrist postures (neutral, 20 degrees of radial deviation, and 30 degrees of ulnar deviation) using 3D scanning and casting methods.Results: As the hand changed from the straight neutral posture to the power grip posture, the Tip-to-PTC/DTC distances (related to grip widths), Tip-to-MMC distances (related to grip heights), and Tip-to-MMC surface lengths (related to grip circumferences) decreased to 30%-65% compared to corresponding original lengths. Wrist posture also had significant effects on the Tip-to-PTC/DTC and Tip-to-MMC distances by 6.5%-9.0%, while finger position significantly affected all the measurements by 8.2%-22.3%.Practitioner summary: The measurement protocol of palmar hand dimensions and the changes in palmar hand measurements by wrist posture are of use to develop an ergonomic handle design for comfort and prevention of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available