Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Explainable machine learning model for liquefaction potential assessment of soils using XGBoost-SHAP
Kaushik Jas et al.
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2023)
Remaining useful life prediction of – Lithium batteries based on principal component analysis and improved Gaussian process regression
Jiang Xing et al.
International Journal of Electrochemical Science (2023)
Modeling industrial hydrocyclone operational variables by SHAP-CatBoost - A conscious lab approach
S. Chehreh Chelgani et al.
POWDER TECHNOLOGY (2023)
Modelling and investigating the impacts of climatic variables on ozone concentration in Malaysia using correlation analysis with random forest, decision tree regression, linear regression, and support vector regression
Abdul-Lateef Balogun et al.
CHEMOSPHERE (2022)
Modeling and optimization of vegetable oil biodiesel production with heterogeneous nano catalytic process: Multi-layer perceptron, decision regression tree, and K-Nearest Neighbor methods
Xuejin Sun et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION (2022)
Comparative analysis of BPNN, SVR, LSTM, Random Forest, and LSTM-SVR for conditional simulation of non-Gaussian measured fluctuating wind pressures
Jinhua Li et al.
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (2022)
Base Oil Process Modelling Using Machine Learning
Muhamad Amir Mohd Fadzil et al.
ENERGIES (2021)
Machine learning based interpretation of microkinetic data: a Fischer-Tropsch synthesis case study
Anoop Chakkingal et al.
REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING (2021)
Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values
Kjersti Aas et al.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (2021)
Gaussian Process Regression for Materials and Molecules
Volker L. Deringer et al.
CHEMICAL REVIEWS (2021)
Adding interpretability to predictive maintenance by machine learning on sensor data
Bram Steurtewagen et al.
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (2021)
Reducing the number of experiments required for modelling the hydrocracking process with kriging through Bayesian transfer learning
Loic Iapteff et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS (2021)
Modeling the Hydrocracking Process with Deep Neural Networks
Wenjiang Song et al.
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH (2020)
Hydrocracking: A Perspective towards Digitalization
Esin Iplik et al.
SUSTAINABILITY (2020)
Development of a SVM model for Prediction of Hydrocracking Product Yields
K. Sharifi et al.
PETROLEUM CHEMISTRY (2019)
A continuous lumping model for hydrocracking on a zeolite catalysts: model development and parameter identification
Per Julian Becker et al.
FUEL (2016)
Comparing hydrocracking models: Continuous lumping vs. single events
P. J. Becker et al.
FUEL (2016)
Development of Vacuum Residue Hydrodesulphurization-Hydrocracking Models and Their Integration with Refinery Hydrogen Networks
Blessing Umana et al.
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH (2016)
A study on C.5 Decision Tree Classification Algorithm for Risk Predictions during Pregnancy
B. N. Lakshmi et al.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TRENDS IN ENGINEERING, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICETEST - 2015) (2016)
Modeling the Hydrocracking Kinetics of Atmospheric Residue in Hydrotreating Processes by the Continuous Lumping Approach
Haitham M. S. Lababidi et al.
ENERGY & FUELS (2011)
On the detailed solution and application of the continuous kinetic lumping modeling to hydrocracking of heavy oils
Ignacio Elizalde et al.
FUEL (2011)
Principal component analysis
Herve Abdi et al.
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS (2010)
Application of continuous kinetic lumping modeling to moderate hydrocracking of heavy oil
Ignacio Elizalde et al.
APPLIED CATALYSIS A-GENERAL (2009)
Top 10 algorithms in data mining
Xindong Wu et al.
KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS (2008)
Kinetic modeling of hydrocracking of heavy oil fractions:: A review
J Ancheyta et al.
CATALYSIS TODAY (2005)
Industrial hydrocracker model based on novel continuum lumping approach for optimization in petroleum refinery
K Basak et al.
CATALYSIS TODAY (2004)