4.3 Article

An Ex Vivo Aorta Culture Model to Study Vascular Cellular Senescence

Journal

ADVANCED BIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adbi.202300140

Keywords

bleomycin; ex vivo; senescence model; vascular aging; vessel culture

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study develops a new model for studying vascular cellular senescence by combining ex vivo aortic culture and Matrigel subcutaneous implantation. The results show that this model can accurately evaluate the degree of vascular aging and reveal differentially expressed genes and changes in inflammatory cytokines.
Animal studies on vascular aging pose a few limitations. One of the most important reasons for this is the absence of a fast and efficient model of vascular tissue aging. In this study, ex vivo aortic culture and Matrigel subcutaneous implantation are combined to develop a new model for studying vascular cellular senescence. Eight-week-old C57BL/6J mice are used to obtain aortas. Bleomycin is used to induce aortas senescence in vitro. Then, aortas are transplanted to the acceptor mice with Matrigel. Senescence is evaluated using western blotting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and senescence-associated beta-galactosidase activity. Inflammatory cytokines are detected using Luminex Liquid Suspension Chip. RNA levels are analyzed by transcriptome sequencing. The results revealed that vessels in the bleomycin group exhibited significant senescence than those in the control group that can be enhanced by stripping vessel adventitia. The levels of cytokines such as interleukin (IL-2, IL-1 beta, and IL-6 increased significantly in the ex vivo model. Furthermore, transcriptome sequencing revealed 56 significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in ex vivo model vessels compared with those in naturally aging aortas. In conclusion, this study introduces a cost-effective and time-saving vessel senescence model for vascular cellular senescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available