4.7 Article

Energization of Charged Test Particles in Magnetohydrodynamic Fields: Waves versus Turbulence Picture

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 959, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad055b

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses direct numerical simulations to investigate the relationship between wave modes and coherent structures in three-dimensional compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence, and the resulting energization of test particles. The main mechanism of particle energization is found to be through structures rather than resonance with wave modes.
Direct numerical simulations of three-dimensional compressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence have been performed in order to study the relation between wave modes and coherent structures and the consequent energization of test particles. Moreover, the question of which is the main mechanism of this particle energization is rigorously discussed. In particular, using the same initial conditions, we analyzed the nonlinear and linear evolution of a turbulent state along with the case of randomized phases. Then, the behaviors of the linear and nonlinear simulations were compared through the study of the time evolution of particle kinetic energy and preferential concentration. Also, spatiotemporal spectra were used to identify the presence of wave modes and quantify the fraction of energy around the MHD modes in linear and nonlinear simulations. Finally, the variation of the correlation time of the external forcing is studied in detail along with the effect on the particle energization (and clustering) and the presence of wave modes. More specifically, particle energization tends to decrease when the fraction of linear energy increases, supporting the idea that energization by structures is the dominant mechanism for particle energization instead of resonance with wave modes as suggested by Fermi energization theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available