4.2 Article

Instrumental helping and short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees and human children

Journal

ETHOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eth.13426

Keywords

children; chimpanzees; helping; instrumental helping; prosocial behaviour; short-term reciprocity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a study comparing short-term reciprocity between chimpanzees and human children, it was found that children consistently reciprocated help, while chimpanzees stopped discriminating between helpful and unhelpful partners as the experiment progressed. This demonstrates differences in short-term reciprocity between the two species.
Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans cooperate in reciprocal patterns, but it is unclear whether these interactions are based on the same psychological foundations. While there is evidence suggesting that both species engage in long-term forms of reciprocity, there is very little work exploring their short-term behavioural contingencies with suitable methods. Here, we present a direct comparative study on short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees and human children using a novel, low-cost instrumental helping task. We investigated whether participants help a conspecific partner to obtain a tool for accessing a reward, and whether the level of helping depends on the partner's previous helpful or unhelpful behaviour. In line with prior research, both chimpanzees and children demonstrated helping behaviour towards their partner. However, the extent to which the two species showed short-term reciprocity differed considerably. After receiving help, tested children always helped in return. They helped substantially less when interacting with an unhelpful partner. Chimpanzees showed a higher tendency to help when interacting with a helpful compared to an unhelpful partner only in the first half the experiment. With increasing trial number, chimpanzees stopped discriminating between helpful and unhelpful partners. This study provides evidence for short-term reciprocity in human children and, to a lesser extent, in our closest living relatives. Our findings demonstrate that helping paradigms provide a useful context to investigate reciprocal motives in humans and chimpanzees alike. We present the first direct comparative study on short-term reciprocity in chimpanzees (a) and human children (b). In a novel version of an instrumental helping task, subjects could press a button to help a partner access a tool. Chimpanzees and children helped. However, the extent of short-term reciprocity differed. After receiving help, children always helped in return but helped substantially less when interacting with an unhelpful partner. Chimpanzees showed similar short-term reciprocity only in the first half of the experiment.image

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available