4.3 Article

Test-retest reliability of the urban outdoor situated phoneme (SiP) test

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2023.2281880

Keywords

Speech audiometry; phonemic discrimination; hearing impairment; matched-spectrum real-world maskers; MSRW maskers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces the urban outdoor version of the Situated Phoneme (SiP) test and investigates its test-retest reliability. The results show that the test has high test-retest reliability, which can help audiologists interpret the test scores.
Objective: To introduce the urban outdoor version of the Situated Phoneme (SiP) test and investigate its test-retest reliability.Design: Phonemic discrimination scores in matched-spectrum real-world (MSRW) maskers from an urban outdoor environment were measured using a three-alternative forced choice test paradigm at different phoneme-to-noise ratios (PNR). Each measurement was repeated twice. Test-retest scores for the full 84-trial SiP-test, as well as for four types of contrasting phonemes, were analysed and compared to critical difference scores based on binomial confidence intervals.Study sample: Seventy-two adult native speakers of Swedish (26-83 years) with symmetric hearing threshold levels ranging from normal hearing to severe sensorineural hearing loss.Results: Test-retest scores did not differ significantly for the whole test, or for the subtests analysed. A lower amount of test-retest score difference than expected exceeded the bounds of the corresponding critical difference intervals.Conclusions: The urban outdoor SiP-test has high test-retest reliability. This information can help audiologists to interpret test scores attained with the urban outdoor SiP-test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available