4.5 Article

Strength characteristics of marine clay mixed with coal ash and cement with microstructural verification

Journal

MARINE GEORESOURCES & GEOTECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/1064119X.2023.2284260

Keywords

Marine clay; ordinary Portland cement; soil stabilization; coal ash

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses coal ash to stabilize marine clay soil, and the results show that the strength of the treated soil sample increases with increasing additive percentage and curing period. The composition of minerals in the untreated soil sample changes over time.
This study uses coal ash obtained from the Tanjung Bin coal power plant consisting of a mixture of fly ash and bottom ash at different ratios. Such mixtures will be used with the minimum amount of Ordinary Portland Cement to stabilise marine clay. Compaction data corresponding to a mixture of coal ash and OPC mixed with marine clay soil provides 1535 and 1600 kg/m3 MDD and 18-22.2% OMC ranges, as additive percentages are increased. The unconfined compressive strength test indicated the highest increase at 50BA:50FA ratio with a value of 536 kPa at 15% of additive. The strength of the treated soil sample would also increase with increasing additive percentage and curing period. The XRD of untreated soil sample indicates composition intensity for minerals like quartz, mica, kaolinite, calcite, montmorillonite, and muscovite generally decreased with curing time; on the other hand, halloysite composition reduced. However, a new mineral is formed: calcium aluminium silicate hydroxide hydrate. Moreover, the FESEM results show that the treated marine clay surface particles looked denser with time. Structural voids were also reduced. In line with the XRD and FESEM test outcomes, the EDX results indicated that the formed cementitious products comprised calcium aluminate silicate hydrate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available