4.1 Review

An expert-driven framework for applying eDNA tools to improve biosecurity in the Antarctic

Journal

MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 379-402

Publisher

REGIONAL EURO-ASIAN BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS CENTRE-REABIC
DOI: 10.3391/mbi.2023.14.3.01

Keywords

biofouling; environmental DNA; non-native species; marine; Southern Ocean; terrestrial; risk assessment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Signatories to the Antarctic Treaty System's Environmental Protocol are committed to preventing non-native species incursions in Antarctica. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) methods can enhance the detection and monitoring of non-native species for biosecurity purposes. This study identified priority biosecurity risks for the Australian Antarctic Program in East Antarctica and determined that the most appropriate eDNA methods should be capable of detecting high-risk taxonomic groups such as mussels, tunicates, springtails, and grasses. The most beneficial applications of eDNA biosecurity in Antarctica include surveillance of marine species, terrestrial invertebrates, and biofouling organisms on visiting vessels.
Signatories to the Antarctic Treaty System's Environmental Protocol are committed to preventing incursions of non-native species into Antarctica, but systematic surveillance is rare. Environmental DNA (eDNA) methods provide new opportunities for enhancing detection of non-native species and biosecurity monitoring. To be effective for Antarctic biosecurity, eDNA tests must have appropriate sensitivity and specificity to distinguish non-native from native Antarctic species, and be fit-for-purpose. This requires knowledge of the priority risk species or taxonomic groups for which eDNA surveillance will be informative, validated eDNA assays for those species or groups, and reference DNA sequences for both target non-native and related native Antarctic species. Here, we used an expert elicitation process and decision-by-consensus approach to identify and assess priority biosecurity risks for the Australian Antarctic Program (AAP) in East Antarctica, including identifying high priority non-native species and their potential transport pathways. We determined that the priority targets for biosecurity monitoring were not individual species, but rather broader taxonomic groups such as mussels (Mytilus species), tunicates (Ascidiacea), springtails (Collembola), and grasses (Poaceae). These groups each include multiple species with high risks of introduction to and/or establishment in Antarctica. The most appropriate eDNA methods for the AAP must be capable of detecting a range of species within these high-risk groups (e.g., eDNA metabarcoding). We conclude that the most beneficial Antarctic eDNA biosecurity applications include surveillance of marine species in nearshore environments, terrestrial invertebrates, and biofouling species on vessels visiting Antarctica. An urgent need exists to identify suitable genetic markers for detecting priority species groups, establish baseline terrestrial and marine biodiversity for Antarctic stations, and develop eDNA sampling methods for detecting biofouling organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available