4.2 Article

New taxa of Plagiothecium (Plagiotheciaceae) from Pakistan

Journal

PHYTOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 236, Pages 1-16

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.236.109519

Keywords

Bryophyta; new taxa; Pakistan; Plagiotheciaceae; South Asia; taxonomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A revision of specimens of Plagiothecium collected in Pakistan reveals the presence of five taxa, including a new variety. The specimens exhibit distinct qualitative and quantitative characteristics of their gametophyte, leading to the proposal of two new species within this taxon.
A revision of specimens of Plagiothecium deposited in the herbarium of Pakistan Museum of Natural History (PMNH) collected during a Japanese lead project on Cryptogams in the Western Himalaya (Pakistan) shows that the material consists of five taxa. Of the studied samples, the most common taxa were from the P. denticulatum complex, including Plagiothecium denticulatum var. obtusifolium, new to Pakistan. Examination of the rest of the collection showed that it consists of specimens with a unique combination of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of their gametophyte. For example, for small plants, with small asymmetrical, folded leaves, gradually tapering into long, acuminate, not denticulate apex, whose leaf cells are long and narrow, making the cell areolation tight, the name Plagiothecium filifolium is proposed. For other plants with large leaves, loosely arranged on the stem, concave, symmetrical to slightly asymmetrical, with denticulate apex and long decurrency composed of rectangular and spherical, inflated cells, the name Plagiothecium higuchii is proposed. However, within this material, specimens differ in terms of the length and width of the leaf cells and therefore, within this taxon, two varieties are distinguished: Plagiothecium higuchii var. higuchii and Plagiothecium higuchii var. brevicellum.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available