4.7 Review

A Review of the Application of Optical and Radar Remote Sensing Data Fusion to Land Use Mapping and Monitoring

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs8010070

Keywords

optical; synthetic aperture radar; meta-analysis; Landsat; ALOS PALSAR; ERS-1 and-2; land cover; decision tree; machine learning; pixel- and segment-level analyses

Funding

  1. Danish Nature Agency
  2. University of Copenhagen
  3. U.K.'s Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/M021998/1]
  4. Horizon 2020 BACI project [640176]
  5. FP7-project HERCULES [603447]
  6. Volkswagen Foundation [A112025]
  7. German Federal Ministry of Economy and Infrastructure (BMWi) [50EE1254]
  8. European Commission (HERCULES) [603447]
  9. Volkswagen Foundation (BALTRAK) [A112025]
  10. German Research Foundation [KU 2458/5]
  11. Einstein Foundation Berlin
  12. NERC [NE/M021998/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M021998/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The wealth of complementary data available from remote sensing missions can hugely aid efforts towards accurately determining land use and quantifying subtle changes in land use management or intensity. This study reviewed 112 studies on fusing optical and radar data, which offer unique spectral and structural information, for land cover and use assessments. Contrary to our expectations, only 50 studies specifically addressed land use, and five assessed land use changes, while the majority addressed land cover. The advantages of fusion for land use analysis were assessed in 32 studies, and a large majority (28 studies) concluded that fusion improved results compared to using single data sources. Study sites were small, frequently 300-3000 km 2 or individual plots, with a lack of comparison of results and accuracies across sites. Although a variety of fusion techniques were used, pre-classification fusion followed by pixel-level inputs in traditional classification algorithms (e.g., Gaussian maximum likelihood classification) was common, but often without a concrete rationale on the applicability of the method to the land use theme being studied. Progress in this field of research requires the development of robust techniques of fusion to map the intricacies of land uses and changes therein and systematic procedures to assess the benefits of fusion over larger spatial scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available