4.4 Article

Performance characteristics of nitramine-based gun propellants with TEGDN as energetic plasticizer

Journal

PROPELLANTS EXPLOSIVES PYROTECHNICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prep.202300129

Keywords

compressive strength; nitramine-based gun propellant; sensitivity; thermochemical characteristics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the performance characteristics of nitramine-based gun propellants using TEGDN as an energetic plasticizer through experimental methods. The results showed that these gun propellant samples had good chemical stability and compatibility, with explosion heat similar to JA2 gun propellant and lower sensitivity. Additionally, their compressive strength was better than that of JA2 gun propellant.
This study mainly explored the performance characteristics of nitramine-based (NB) gun propellants using TEGDN as an energetic plasticizer by experimental method. Three series of NB gun propellant samples with RDX, HMX or CL-20 were prepared referring to the formulation of JA2 gun propellant. Their thermochemical characteristics, explosion heat, chemical stability and compatibility, impact, friction and electrostatic spark sensitivities, and compressive strength were determined by various instruments. The experimental results indicated that the NB gun propellant samples with RDX have lower decomposition temperature, and those with CL-20 have higher thermogravimetric loss. Three series of NB gun propellant samples have good chemical stability and compatibility, and their explosion heat is close to that of JA2 gun propellant, but their sensitivity is lower than that of JA2 gun propellant. The maximum stress of three series of NB gun propellant samples decreases with increasing cyclic nitramine (RDX, HMX or CL-20) content, and their compressive strength is better than that of JA2 gun propellant. image

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available