4.7 Article

Differentiation of protein types extracted from tilapia byproducts by FTIR spectroscopy combined with chemometric analysis and their antioxidant protein hydrolysates

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 437, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137862

Keywords

Differentiation of protein type; Tilapia byproducts; FTIR spectrometry; Principal component analysis; Protein hydrolysates; Antioxidant activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research aimed to characterize different protein types in tilapia byproducts and found that alkali-aided protein extract (AP) had a higher content of 8-sheet structure and lower total sulfhydryl content and surface hydrophobicity. After protein hydrolysis, AP hydrolysate showed the strongest ABTS radical scavenging activity, while sarcoplasmic protein (SP) hydrolysate had the strongest metal chelating ability.
This research aimed to characterize protein types including sarcoplasmic protein (SP), myofibrillar protein (MP), and alkali-aided protein extract (AP) prepared from tilapia byproducts using water, 0.6 M NaCl, and alkaline solution (pH 11), respectively compared to freeze-dried minced tilapia muscle (CONTROL). Principal component analysis was performed from second derivative FTIR spectra to differentiate protein type. The AP mostly contained 8-sheet structure and had low total sulfhydryl content and surface hydrophobicity. SP can be distinguished from MP by the loading plots of the FTIR bands representing the alpha-helical structure. While the bands for lipids and 8-sheet of protein were noted for differentiating AP from CONTROL. After being hydrolyzed by Protease G6, the AP hydrolysate disclosed the highest ABTS radical scavenging activity, while the SP hydrolysate revealed the strongest metal chelating ability. Thus, an understanding of how fish processing waste can be utilized in the production of antioxidant protein hydrolysates has been achieved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available