4.7 Article

Stress-annealing induced quasistatic creep recovery in ZrCuAlNi metallic glass

Journal

JOURNAL OF NON-CRYSTALLINE SOLIDS
Volume 624, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.122704

Keywords

Metallic glass; Stress-annealing treatment; Creep recovery; Heterogeneous structure; Structural relaxation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The relationship between the heterogeneous structure and structural relaxation in metallic glasses was explored by investigating the quasielastic and viscoelastic behavior of a Zr55Cu30Ni5Al10 metallic glass. Stress-annealing treatment was used to retain elastic strain energy, and a unique creep recovery phenomenon was observed during the reheating process. The Maxwell model was employed to qualitatively describe the mechanisms of elastic strain energy retention and release.
The relationship between the structural relaxation of metallic glasses and their heterogeneous structure, characterized by a weakly bonded region and a strongly bonded region, remains ambiguous. Thus, our study aimed to explore the connection between the heterogeneous structure and structural relaxation by investigating the quasielastic and viscoelastic behavior of a Zr55Cu30Ni5Al10 metallic glass. Stress-annealing (SA) treatment was employed to retain elastic strain energy by subjecting the sample to constant stress and temperature. During the reheating of the SA-treated sample, we observed a unique shrinkage and elongation phenomenon in the glassysolid region, known as creep recovery (CR). To qualitatively describe the mechanisms of elastic strain energy retention and release, we employed the Maxwell model, which accounts for the heterogeneous structure. The residual elastic strain energy was determined by the discrepancy in relaxation ability within the heterogeneous structure, and the shrinkage and elongation of the CR were associated with structural relaxation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available