3.8 Article

PRESERVING AUSTRALIA'S CAVE ART

Journal

ROCK ART RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 2, Pages 145-158

Publisher

ARCHAEOLOGICAL PUBL

Keywords

Cave art; Preservation; Protection; Management plan; Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The national management plan for Australian cave art is necessary due to the various language groups and different land types where the fifty-four known sites are located. The current complex management structures hinder the uniform preservation of the cave art. Human visitation is seen as the biggest threat to the conservation of the art, but the possibility of creating cave art replicas is recommended. The proposed management plan suggests the establishment of an organization responsible for the perpetual preservation of all Australian cave art sites.
A key reason for the need for a national management plan for Australian cave art is that the fifty-four known sites occur on the traditional lands of several different language groups; and they are found on private land, public land and land dedicated to the production of pine trees, but under different management systems and in different states. This complex mosaic of management structures is not conducive to the uniform preservation of cave art. A few sites are already subject to existing management practices, but most are not. Since all face the same preservation issues, they need to be subjected to uniform effective protection and conservation regimes. The key variables for this to be achieved are listed and elucidated, and it is noted that not one of the sites is suitable for tourism. Human visitation of the caves is considered the greatest threat to the conservation of rock art found in them. However, it is recommended to consider the establishment of cave art facsimiles, which have proved extraordinarily successful in France and Spain. The management plan proposed here recommends the creation of an entity responsible for the perpetual preservation of all Australian cave art sites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available