3.8 Article

Adapting Ferrante's My Brilliant Friend for television: Faithfulness and authenticity

Journal

FORUM ITALICUM
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/00145858231215038

Keywords

adaptation; authenticity; discourse; faithfulness; international; interpretation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the production and development of the television adaptation of Elena Ferrante's Neapolitan novels, specifically the first season of "My Brilliant Friend". It explores the concepts of faithfulness and authenticity in relation to this adaptation through discourse analysis. The study highlights the complexities and ambiguities of these concepts, as they are often intertwined with their semantic opposites.
My Brilliant Friend (MBF) is a television adaptation of Elena Ferrante's Neapolitan novels. This study focuses on the first season of the series, which transposes L'amica geniale, the first of four novels. Our goal is to go beyond traditional comparisons between source texts and adaptations to explore the discourse on the production and development of MBF. We collected and analyzed newspaper and magazine articles, YouTube interviews, and studies that focus on the adaptation of L'amica geniale. Drawing on this corpus, we use discourse analysis to interrogate the two concepts that inform discussions on the artistic and cultural value of this adaptation: faithfulness and authenticity. Far from being unproblematic, these interrelated concepts are ambiguous and elusive because they are entangled with their semantic opposites. The quest for faithfulness clashes with the transformations that occur when adjusting a source text to the affordances of another medium. Similarly, the authentic and the inauthentic are frequently intermingled. Viewers might believe that they are experiencing the 'real' until they discern that the real was, in fact, staged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available