4.5 Article

Why we should focus more attention on uncertainty distress and intolerance of uncertainty in adolescents and emerging adults

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-023-02343-0

Keywords

Adolescence; Emerging adulthood; Intolerance of uncertainty; Uncertainty distress; Mental health prevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sivertsen et al. (2023) found that adolescents endorsing high levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms are at risk of increased mental health problems during emerging adulthood, and both homotypic and heterotypic continuities of mental disorders exist. This perspective contextualizes their findings in relation to the literature on intolerance of uncertainty and the Uncertainty Distress Model, and calls for further research on how adolescents and emerging adults process and deal with uncertainty.
Sivertsen et al. (2023) showed that adolescents endorsing high levels of internalizing and externalizing symptoms are at risk of increased mental health problems during emerging adulthood and suggested the existence of both homotypic and heterotypic continuities of mental disorders over time. Since adolescence and emerging adulthood are transition periods highly intertwined with uncertainty, the present perspective contextualizes the findings by Sivertsen et al. (2023) in relation to the extant literature on intolerance of uncertainty and the recently developed Uncertainty Distress Model. Moreover, it claims for further research addressing the way adolescents and emerging adults process and deal with uncertainty. Indeed, focusing more attention on the implications of trans-situational and trans-diagnostic constructs such as uncertainty distress and intolerance of uncertainty in these life stages may hold great promise to design and implement effective mental health prevention programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available