4.7 Article

Event-by-event investigation of the two-particle source function in √sNN=2.76 TeV PbPb collisions with EPOS

Journal

PHYSICS LETTERS B
Volume 847, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138295

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents the investigation of the two-particle source function in lead-lead collisions simulated by the EPOS model. The results show that a Levy source shape, deviating significantly from a Gaussian shape, is observed for pions, kaons, and protons in individual events. The source parameters extracted are found to be related to the collision centrality and pair average transverse mass. Furthermore, the effects of decay products on the Levy exponent are studied, showing a decrease when including decay products, and no mT-scaling is found across different particle species.
The investigation of the two-particle source function in lead-lead collisions simulated by the EPOS model at a center of mass energy per nucleon pair of root sNN = 2.76 TeV is presented. The two-particle source functions are reconstructed directly on an event-by-event basis for pions, kaons and protons separately, using the final stage of EPOS. A Levy source shape is observed for all three particle species in the individual events, deviating significantly from a Gaussian shape. The source parameters are extracted as functions of collision centrality and pair average transverse mass (mT). The Levy exponent is found to be ordered accordingly to particle mass. The Levy scale parameter is found to scale for all particle species with mT according to Gaussian hydrodynamic predictions; however, there is no mT-scaling found across these species. In case of pions, the effects of the decay products and hadronic rescattering are also investigated. The Levy exponent is decreased when decay products are also included in the analysis. Without hadronic rescattering and decay products, the source shape is close to a Gaussian.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available