4.7 Article

Rapid Assessments of Amazon Forest Structure and Biomass Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems

Journal

REMOTE SENSING
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs8080615

Keywords

unmanned aircraft; structure-from-motion; SFM-LiDAR fusion; forest carbon monitoring; light detection and ranging (LiDAR); SUAS

Funding

  1. Amazon Conservation Association
  2. Wake Forest Center for Energy, Environment, and Sustainability
  3. Andrew Sabin Family Foundation
  4. Winston-Salem Foundation
  5. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1338694] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide new ways to measure forests and supplement expensive or labor-intensive inventory methods. Forest carbon, a key uncertainty in the global carbon cycle and also important for carbon conservation programs, is typically monitored using manned aircraft or extensive forest plot networks to estimate aboveground carbon density (ACD). Manned aircraft are only cost-effective when applied to large areas (>100,000 ha), while plot networks are most effective for total C stock estimation across large areas, not for quantifying spatially-explicit variation. We sought to develop an effective method for frequent and accurate ACD estimation at intermediate scales (100-100,000 ha) that would be sensitive to small-scale disturbance. Using small UAVs, we collected imagery of 516 ha of lowland forest in the Peruvian Amazon. We then used a structure-from-motion (SFM) approach to create a 3D model of forest canopy. Comparing SFM- and airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived estimates of canopy height and ACD, we found that SFM estimates of top-of-canopy height (TCH) and ACD were highly correlated with previous LiDAR estimates (r = 0.86-0.93 and r = 0.73-0.94 for TCH and ACD, respectively, at 0.1-4 ha grain sizes), with r = 0.92 for ACD determination at the 1 ha scale, despite SFM and LiDAR measurements being separated by two years in a dynamic forest. SFM and LiDAR estimates of mean TCH and mean ACD were highly similar, differing by only 0.4% and 0.04%, respectively, within mature forest. The technique allows inexpensive, near-real-time monitoring of ACD for ecological studies, payment for ecosystem services (PES) ventures, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), forestry enterprises, and governance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available