3.8 Article

The policy landscape for naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses

Journal

DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100126

Keywords

Naloxone; Naloxone access laws; Opioid policy; Overdose prevention; Healing communities study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a descriptive analysis of the policy landscape affecting naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses. The results show variations in naloxone access laws, Medicaid coverage, and community distribution infrastructure among the states. The study highlights the importance of considering the policy environment in the implementation and sustainability of interventions.
Background: Expanding access to naloxone is one of the most impactful interventions in decreasing opioid-related mortality. However, state distribution rates of naloxone are insufficient to meet community need. The current study sought to better understand this gap by focusing on state policies that may facilitate or impede naloxone distribution in four states highly impacted by fatal opioid overdoses - Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio. Methods: We provide a descriptive analysis of the policy landscape impacting naloxone distribution through pharmacy and community channels in the four states participating in the HEALing Communities Study (HCS). Publicly available data and the expertise of the research team were used to describe each state's naloxone access laws (NALs), Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and community overdose education and naloxone distribution infrastructure. Data presented in this study represent the most current policy landscape through September 2022. Results: Variation exists between specific components of the NALs of each state, the structure of Medicaid coverage of naloxone, and the community distribution infrastructure networks. Massachusetts and New York have a statewide standing order, but other states use different strategies short of a statewide standing order to expand access to naloxone. Quantity limits specific to naloxone may limit access to Medicaid beneficiaries in some states. Conclusion: States participating in the HCS have developed innovative but different mechanisms to ensure naloxone access. Policies were dynamic and moved towards greater access. Research should consider the policy landscape in the implementation and sustainability of interventions as well as the analysis of outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available