4.7 Article

A New Approach for Mineral Mapping Using Drill-Core Hyperspectral Image

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3328139

Keywords

Deep learning; drill-core hyperspectral image; mineral mapping; spectral angle mapping (SAM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This letter discusses the application of hyperspectral remote sensing technology in geological fields and proposes a new approach called graph convolutional neural networks-SAM (GCNNSAM) to improve the accuracy of mineral mapping using drill-core hyperspectral images. By comparing different mapping methods, the study verifies the reliability of the proposed method and provides a new idea for mineral information acquisition in geological research.
Hyperspectral remote sensing technology has been successfully applied to geological fields. Drill-core hyperspectral imagery has the characteristics of segmented processing and large data volume. Due to its simple principle and high accuracy, spectral angle mapping (SAM) has become the most commonly used method for mineral mapping using drill-core hyperspectral images. However, SAM analyzes the entire spectral form of minerals and is not sensitive enough to small differences in drill-core mineral spectra. Compared with traditional machine learning methods, deep learning has more powerful feature learning and feature expression capabilities. In order to improve the mineral mapping accuracy, this letter proposes a new approach called graph convolutional neural networks-SAM (GCNNSAM), which integrates the advantages of deep learning and spectral matching to extract mineral information from drill-core hyperspectral images. Taking the drill-core hyperspectral data near the depth of 240 m as an example, this letter compares the performances of SAM, GCNN, and GCNNSAM mapping methods. The results show that the overall accuracy of the GCNNSAM mapping is 89.23%, and the overall accuracies of SAM and GCNN mapping methods are 80.25% and 83.58%, respectively. Comparing the mineral mapping statistical results of GCNNSAM with the measured geological statistical results, the maximum statistical error of mineral relative content is 1.4%, and the errors are all less than 2%, which verifies the reliability of the proposed method in this study. The method provides a new idea for mineral information acquisition in geological research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available