Journal
SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY AND PHARMACY
Volume 36, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scp.2023.101289
Keywords
Rumex hastatus; Response surface methodology; Choline chloride-glycerol DES; Microwave-assisted extraction; Ultrasound-assisted extraction
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study explored the extraction of polyphenolic and antioxidant compounds from Rumex hastatus D. Don using glycerol-choline chloride deep eutectic solvent and modern techniques such as ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The results showed that MAE was more efficient in terms of time input and recovery of total polyphenols. The method based on DES-MAE is recommended for industrial use in obtaining bioactives from R. hastatus.
Rumex hastatus D. Don is a medicinal wild herb that abundantly grows in many parts of the world. The current work explores the extraction of its polyphenolic and antioxidant compounds using glycerol-choline chloride deep eutectic solvent and two modern techniques, ultrasound assisted extraction (UAE) and microwave-assisted extraction (MAE). The optimization was done as per the response surface methodology. Six responses were studied including total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total condensed tannin content (TCT), ferrous ironchelating (FIC) activity, DPPH radical scavenging activity (RSA), and ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP). The optimal factors for MAE were 10 s extraction time, 229.40 W power, 40 mL/g SSR (solvent-to-solid ratio) and 60 % DES concentration with the predicted TPC, TFC, TCT, FIC, RSA and FRAP as 64.46 mg GAE/g PM, 155.78 mg RE/g PM, 129.73 mg CE/g PM, 51.46 mg EDTAE/g PM, 235.84 mg AAE/g PM and 129.14 mg AAE/g PM, respectively. For UAE, the predicted optimal factors were 24.30 min sonication time, 47 degrees C extraction temperature, 40 mL/g SSR and 60 % DES concentration with the predicted TPC, TFC, TCT, FIA, RSA, and FRAP as 56.54 mg GAE/g PM, 148.24 mg RE/g PM, 155.60 mg CE/g PM, 57.83 mg EDTAE/g PM, 240.56 mg AAE/g PM and 111.71 mg AAE/g PM, respectively. Both the models were strongly supported by the validation study with minimal % errors; 2.53-6.38 % for MAE and 1.14-5.30 % for UAE. MAE was more efficient than UAE in terms of time input and recovery of total polyphenols. Therefore, the method based on DES-MAE can safely be recommended for use on an industrial level for obtaining bioactives from R. hastatus.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available